Resources
Identity Use Cases & Scenarios.- FIDIS Deliverables.
- Identity of Identity.
- Interoperability.
- D4.1: Structured account of approaches on interoperability.
- D4.2: Set of requirements for interoperability of Identity Management Systems.
- D4.4: Survey on Citizen's trust in ID systems and authorities.
- D4.5: A Survey on Citizen’s trust in ID systems and authorities.
- D4.6: Draft best practice guidelines.
- D4.7: Review and classification for a FIDIS identity management model.
- D4.8: Creating the method to incorporate FIDIS research for generic application.
- D4.9: An application of the management method to interoperability within e-Health.
- D4.10: Specification of a portal for interoperability of identity management systems.
- D4.11: eHealth identity management in several types of welfare states in Europe.
- Profiling.
- Forensic Implications.
- HighTechID.
- Privacy and legal-social content.
- Mobility and Identity.
- Other.
- IDIS Journal.
- FIDIS Interactive.
- Press & Events.
- In-House Journal.
- Booklets
- Identity in a Networked World.
- Identity R/Evolution.
 |
Title: COMPETENCE |
 |
Competence
I believe that the authorities that will manage my ID data are professional and competent.
ID authorities will be competent in dealing with the data they hold on me.
Competence of ID authorities in dealing with or managing ID data received a negative overall evaluation. UK and Ireland rate highest and the mean for Southern Europe is around the scale midpoint. The only exception is Central and Eastern Europe, where the response mean is slightly below 4 for both statements.
One of the statements about the competence of ID authorities was compared across types of settlement. For each settlement type the percentage of those respondents who disagree is above 70%. It is interesting that respondents from large towns have shown slightly less negative attitude.
| |
   |
|
| 13 / 23 |
